When I think of it this way I think breaks can be a great thing.
I guess, like so many other things, whether breaks have value in a relationship can really only be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. What is a necessary and helpful cooling off period for one couple is just postponing the inevitable for another. Maybe. Or maybe breaks are just unilaterally bullshit and if you really wanted to be with the person you’d stay close to them while you worked out your issues.
What is even more interesting about breaks is how the rules for behaviour change when you’re on one. That’s where shit gets real, isn’t it? I’d bet that for every person who thinks that a relationship break is a free for all where you’re allowed to act as though you’re single while simultaneously being attached to someone, there is another (probably corresponding) person who thinks that you’re supposed to act as though you’re still in the relationship. To some people, being on a break means you’re free to bone the copy girl, while to others it means you’re supposed to be sitting at home thinking about your partner while not speaking to them or fucking them.
The truth is, there’s a middle ground somewhere between going balls to the wall and cloistering yourself when you’re on a break. The greater truth is that it’s probably nearly impossible to define that middle ground. Is it that we’re allowed to date other people while we’re on a break but not allowed to fuck them? Kiss them? Perform oral sex on them? Tell them our deepest secrets? If we date while we’re on a break, do we owe it to the outside person to let them know that there is a relationship looming over our head? Are we being disrespectful to our partners if we don’t divulge that? When the break is over are we supposed to confess all of our breaktime activities? Or do we invoke a don’t ask/don’t tell policy?